曹子林, 王晓丽, 张权新, 李根前. 紫茎泽兰入侵的云南松林种群结构及其土壤种子库特征[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(6): 958-964. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20160039
引用本文: 曹子林, 王晓丽, 张权新, 李根前. 紫茎泽兰入侵的云南松林种群结构及其土壤种子库特征[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(6): 958-964. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20160039
CAO Zi-lin, WANG Xiao-li, ZHANG Quan-xin, LI Gen-qian. Characteristics of population structure and soil seed bank of Pinus yunnanensis population invaded by Eupatorium adenophorum[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2016, 38(6): 958-964. DOI: 10.7540/j.ynu.20160039
Citation: CAO Zi-lin, WANG Xiao-li, ZHANG Quan-xin, LI Gen-qian. Characteristics of population structure and soil seed bank of Pinus yunnanensis population invaded by Eupatorium adenophorum[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2016, 38(6): 958-964. DOI: 10.7540/j.ynu.20160039

紫茎泽兰入侵的云南松林种群结构及其土壤种子库特征

Characteristics of population structure and soil seed bank of Pinus yunnanensis population invaded by Eupatorium adenophorum

  • 摘要: 云南松林普遍受到紫茎泽兰的入侵干扰,其林下幼苗更新困难.作者研究了云南省昆明市呼马山紫茎泽兰入侵的云南松林种群结构及其土壤种子库特征,以期揭示其天然更新差及种群衰退的原因.结果表明:0~2cm土层、凋落物层、2~5cm及5~10cm土层种子储量分别为2723.4、1567.2、1365.6、1107.8粒/m2,分别占总储量的40.26%、23.17%、20.19%、16.38%.种子种类共有52种,分属25科49属.以菊科为优势科,种子储量5475.0粒/m2,占80.94%;泽兰属为优势属,紫茎泽兰为优势种,种子储量均为5262.5粒/m2,均占77.80%.以草本为优势生活型,共41种,种子储量6504.7粒/m2,占总储量的96.17%;灌木种类9种,种子储量256.3粒/m2,占总储量的3.79%;乔木只有2种,种子储量3.1粒/m2,占总储量的0.05%.云南松种群结构类似倒金字塔型,为衰退型种群.紫茎泽兰与云南松种子储量分别为5262.5粒/m2、1.6粒/m2,比值为3368∶1.云南松林下存活种子储量极少,是其天然更新差及种群衰退的原因之一;而紫茎泽兰种子储量十分丰富,将是云南松天然更新潜在障碍之一.

     

    Abstract: Pinus yunnanensis forests were invaded and disturbed by Eupatorium adenophorum,and P.yunnanensis seedlings were difficult to regenerate under the forests.Soil seed bank characteristics and population structure of P.yunnanensis forest invaded by E.adenophorum in Humashan,Kunming,Yunnan Provine,were studied to find out the reasons for bad natural regeneration and the decline of the populations.The results showed that the seeds storage in 0—2cm,litter layer,2—5cm,5—10cm were 2723.4,1567.2,1365.6,1107.8seeds/m2,accounting for 40.26%,23.17%,20.19%,16.38% of total storage,respectively.There were 52 seed spieces,which belong to 25 families and 49 genera.Composite was the dominant family,with a density of 5475.0seeds/m2,accounting for 80.94% of total storage.Eupatorium was the dominant genus,and E.adenophorum was the dominant species,both with a density of 5262.5seeds/m2,accounting for 77.80% of total storage.Herb speices were the dominant life form which has 41 speices,the density of the herb species seeds was 6504.7seeds/m2,accounting for 96.17% of total storage in the soil seeds bank.There were 9 shrub species with a density of 256.3seeds/m2,accounting for 3.79% of total storage.There were only 2 tree species with a density of 3.1 seeds/m2,accounting for 0.05% of total storage.Population of P.yunnanensisis was a declined population with which its age structure was similar to inverted pyramid shape.The seed storage of seed bank of E.adenophorum and P.yunnanensis was 5262.5seeds/m2,1.6seeds/m2,respectively,with a ratio of 3368∶1.The reserve of survival seeds of P.yunnanensis in the forest was very few,which was one reason of bad natural regeneration and population decline;whereas the abundant seeds reserve of E.adenophorum,could be one of the potential barrier in the natural regeneration of P.yunnanensis.

     

/

返回文章
返回