韩泽军, 丁洪伟, 岳昆, 李春芬, 杨志军. 碰撞长度可变的三时钟N−CSMA的WSN协议分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 699-706. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170766
引用本文: 韩泽军, 丁洪伟, 岳昆, 李春芬, 杨志军. 碰撞长度可变的三时钟N−CSMA的WSN协议分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 699-706. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170766
HAN Ze-jun, DING Hong-wei, YUE Kun, LI Chun-fen, YANG Zhi-jun. WSN protocol analysis of three clock N−CSMA with variable collision length[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2019, 41(4): 699-706. DOI: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170766
Citation: HAN Ze-jun, DING Hong-wei, YUE Kun, LI Chun-fen, YANG Zhi-jun. WSN protocol analysis of three clock N−CSMA with variable collision length[J]. Journal of Yunnan University: Natural Sciences Edition, 2019, 41(4): 699-706. DOI: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170766

碰撞长度可变的三时钟N−CSMA的WSN协议分析

WSN protocol analysis of three clock N−CSMA with variable collision length

  • 摘要: 非坚持随机多址接入无线传感器网络虽然可以控制系统和降低能耗,但其效果一般,实用性不强. 提出了一种基于碰撞长度可变的三时钟N−CSMA的WSN协议,通过划分成功分组发送时间(1+a),碰撞分组发送时间(b+a),空闲分组发送时间a,以此得到系统的吞吐率、碰撞率、空闲率、信息分组发送时延等重要的系统参数. 通过改变碰撞长度b的取值,降低节点平均功率Pn,延长业务节点使用周期T,以此降低业务节点损坏频率,达到降低系统成本的目的. 最后用仿真实验验证了理论分析的正确性并对比分析了非坚持协议、1−坚持协议和p−坚持协议的性能.

     

    Abstract: The non−persistent random multiple access wireless sensor network can control the system and reduce the energy consumption, but its effect is general and its practicability is not strong. This paper presents a WSN protocol of the variable collision length with three clock based on N−CSMA, by dividing successful packet transmission time (1+a), collision packet transmission time (b+a), idle packet transmission time a, in order to get the system throughput rate, collision rate, idle rate, packet transmission delay such important system parameters. By changing the value of collision length b, the average power Pn of the nodes is reduced, and the service life T of the business nodes is prolonged, so as to reduce the damage frequency of the business nodes and achieve the purpose of reducing the system cost. Finally, the correctness of the theoretical analysis is verified by simulation experiments, and the performance of the non−persistent protocol, 1−persistence protocol and p−persistence protocol are compared and analyzed.

     

/

返回文章
返回